[Discuss] Canary heart beat protocol?
Lincoln Bryant
lincolnb at uchicago.edu
Wed Jun 10 17:29:53 UTC 2015
Seems like the Canary Watch website is powered by user submission, and checks aren't done routinely. That's certainly something that could be improved.
re: the tweet, I feel like creating a standard for warrant canaries is tricky business -- seems like it would make it easier to draft legislation to prohibit canaries.
--Lincoln
On Jun 10, 2015, at 11:54 AM, sheila miguez wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 11:45 AM, meg ford <meg387 at gmail.com> wrote:
> something similar. Not sure if you're aware of it -- maybe it will help to look at how they are dealing with reliability of info:
> https://canarywatch.org/
>
> Oh thanks! I looked at their twitter account and discovered https://firstlook.org/code/project/autocanary/ too. the canarywatch account retweeted https://twitter.com/calyxinstitute/status/605737561991061505 which is asking about canary standards.
>
>
> --
> shekay at pobox.com
> _______________________________________________
> discuss mailing list
> discuss at lists.chicagolug.org
> https://lists.chicagolug.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.chicagolug.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20150610/8bb32851/attachment-0002.html>
More information about the discuss
mailing list