[Discuss] Canary heart beat protocol?

Lincoln Bryant lincolnb at uchicago.edu
Wed Jun 10 17:29:53 UTC 2015


Seems like the Canary Watch website is powered by user submission, and checks aren't done routinely. That's certainly something that could be improved.

re: the tweet, I feel like creating a standard for warrant canaries is tricky business -- seems like it would make it easier to draft legislation to prohibit canaries.

--Lincoln

On Jun 10, 2015, at 11:54 AM, sheila miguez wrote:

> 
> On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 11:45 AM, meg ford <meg387 at gmail.com> wrote:
> something similar. Not sure if you're aware of it -- maybe it will help to look at how they are dealing with reliability of info:
> https://canarywatch.org/
> 
> Oh thanks! I looked at their twitter account and discovered https://firstlook.org/code/project/autocanary/ too. the canarywatch account retweeted https://twitter.com/calyxinstitute/status/605737561991061505 which is asking about canary standards.
> 
> 
> -- 
> shekay at pobox.com
> _______________________________________________
> discuss mailing list
> discuss at lists.chicagolug.org
> https://lists.chicagolug.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.chicagolug.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20150610/8bb32851/attachment-0002.html>


More information about the discuss mailing list