[Discuss] Proposing OpenShift & Docker as a Meetup topic for May
Jim Campbell
jcampbell at gnome.org
Thu Apr 16 17:33:10 UTC 2015
Thanks, ryan,
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015, at 05:31 PM, ryan jarvinen wrote:
> The betas of OpenShiftV3 (w/docker)
still have a lot of rough edges, so I usually only demo the
lower-level Docker and Kubernetes pieces anyway. I was going
to drop my "project Atomic" section since you've had that
covered recently.
>
>
Normally, I also include a quick intro to our stable (non-Docker)
release of OpenShift, to give people an idea of the UX workflows
that they can expect to see exposed atop Kubernetes and the newer
"V3" platform.
>
>
Here are two alternative topics that might also work:
> http://fluentconf.com/javascript-html-2015/public/schedule/speaker/152030
>
>
"Building Release Pipelines on the Open Web" is more DevOps /
Release Eng focused, using OpenShift V2 and V3 as simple
deployment targets.
>
"Open Platforms for Federated Futures" is pretty much a
developer-focused rant on building decentralized applications, in
which I argue that Docker and "platform" standardization are major
technical advancements for folks who are interested in building
distributed solutions.
>
>
NP if the timing isn't quite right this time around.
>
<3
>
--ryanj
I'd like to hear from other LUG members as to what they'd prefer from
the above. Maybe folks could elaborate on anything specific that they'd
like to know about so that ryan could taylor his talk to us a bit.
And as a side note to LUG members, ryan was one of the few (the only?)
out-of-towner(s) to make it so our GNOME Beers event last August. So if
you were at that event, you probably talked with him a bit then.
Cheers,
Jim
>
>
On 04/15/2015 09:52 AM, meg ford wrote:
>> Hey, On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 7:23 PM,
eviljoel <eviljoel at linux.com> wrote:
>>> My only
reservation about
>>>
>>>
having an OpenShift and Docker talk is that someone has
presented on
>>>
>>>
both of those topics recently.
>>
>> The description does mention Kubernetes as well --
maybe Ryan could emphasize that part of the talk so we are
learnign about soemthign that hasn't been covered before?
Is that a possibility, Ryan?
>>
>> Thanks, Meg
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
discuss mailing list
>> discuss at lists.chicagolug.org
>> http://lists.chicagolug.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>>
>>
>
>
> _________________________________________________
> discuss mailing list discuss at lists.chicagolug.org
> http://lists.chicagolug.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.chicagolug.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20150416/a862254d/attachment-0002.html>
More information about the discuss
mailing list